Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
I see so much content that has models faking their way through a scene or just putting on a crap or even strange performance and wonder why?
Anyone who wants to shoot good content need only look at the mainstream sex scenes on www.mrskin.com then alter them to include real sex, genitalia, fucking what ever. Tell the models to get on with it so you can see/film it and press record.
Needs a bit of skill to get lighting, angles, framing right. But that's the easy part. Contrary to what Cherry thinks, shooting porn is about making models work, not cameras.
A high quality image of low quality porn = low quality porn.
A low quality image of high quality porn = high quality porn. |
More nonsense. I am sure you just write any old bollocks that comes into your head because you have some need to be the center of attention. Why you look for it here and not in your home is a puzzle, but very sad.
To address the point,
What you want is good action shot well.
The clip you posted is OK but lacking in any real ideas, and is not well lit, shot or edited.
You think shooting video is easy, but you have failed to do it. You have never read a book about, never studied it, never done it.
You do not shoot in shots to be edited into sequences.
You think it is about making the model work, and you demonstrated that by the scam you did here on this board with Nathan. You took $3000 made the model do all the work for $500 and kept $2500 for doing fuck all. No idea, no plot, no set, no sexy clothing, no lighting, no shots, no sequences, no editing, no ideas, no chemistry, no atmosphere, nothing, nada, nic zero... You added no value at all
Proving the exact opposite to what you rant on about here, why waste money on a shooter when the result is worse than amateur?