Quote:
Originally Posted by garce
This is the only thing that interests me anymore, Paul. Real - or even pretend - "homemade" amateur stuff, where all parties involved seem to at least care about each other, and are having a bit of fun.
I'd much rather watch an embarrassed, somewhat overweight wife show her tits to her husband, than see yet another plastic-titty "pornstar" take cock ass to mouth and try to pretend she cares.
For me, a 30 second amateur titty flash on Youtube is a thousand times hotter than anything produced by Manwin, ND, or (any other company that mass produces generic porn). No offense meant to either of these fine companies. Their product just doesn't do it for me...
|
And people who think they can recreate that by using the same camera or cell phone the husband would use. Are showing they haven't got a clue. A bad scene shot on a cell phone by a stranger without a clue doesn't transform it into great porn. Well only in the eyes on the people pushing it to consumers.
Fabian is clueless about porn. He's a programmer and little more. his porn knowledge is limited. His prejudices are limitless. I shot for him a decent scene for a man whose condition is clear from Reggies documentary. Yet Fabian goes by what people n GFY think. Yes Pornjew, Warchild and other assorted idiots are his guide to good and bad porn.
His editor is clearly someone who can use an editing program. Nothing more and nothing less. To cut out the beginning and end of the scene proves that. The instruction I received to shoot the scene were lacking in so many ways it's sad. But he has a lot of traffic to waste and sell cheaply. So his porn knowledge has to be great.
And there is partly the reason for the poor conversions and retention figures. People look at a site and sponsor and judge his success on his ability to throw a lot of traffic at it. Let Fabian deal with that side, let a pornographer deal with the porn side. The two jobs have no similar skills.