Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
. Being ignorant is something that can be cured with knowledge.
The quality of porn has little to do with the equipment. It's more often about the ability of the shooter to control and "use" the model.
The problem with ExGF content is any clown can shoot it, or what they call ExGF. Which is usually, a style of shooting professional models.
If you can produce the level of Holly Randal at her best, you're in a very uncompetitive market
|
You get yourself very confused. It is quiet simple.
1) Porn photography was very conservative, rather dull and the photographers to make themselves feel like real professionals made up lots of silly rules so that they could pretend they were "pros". Some have evolved into Met Art etc, but even they produce photographs to a formula.
2) People like to feeling of amateur porn as it felt real without the plastic feel of over made up models being photographed in the same boring way. it is cheap to make and popular.
3) Original creative erotic photography is expensive to make taking a lot of skill, time and money, it has a small audience, mostly in arty circles. made by photographers earning money from other sources.