Quote:
Originally Posted by stocktrader23
Paul God damn it. Your content shows it's age and is nowhere near the level of Twisty's. Your understanding of the paysite model is non existent and all of these pipe dreams you have to fix the adult industry revolve around paying photographers more. You could make a widely profitable solo girl site with a fucking iphone. Nobody gives a shit how many thousands you spend producing what you consider to be great pictures, I can't even find one where the girls look like they give a shit so the lighting and props are the last thing on my mind.
If you want to argue with people about how porn sites should be run at least find someone that doesn't understand them. Telling Shap how to improve his business? Now you sound like will76.
|
Shows the level of your thinking. I never said my content was near the level of Twistys. Only an idiot like Damian would assume the content he posted here was mine. did you make the same mistake?
So tell me where I got my figures wrong on the calculations shown. Obviously some made a lot more than what I put up and some made a lot less. When a guru of the one girl site market, that's a site based on one girl. Tells you all he can afford is $300 a scene and 40 scenes. You start to doubt his abilities. When the all start saying this, you realise few make the money they're convincing people they make. When they offer top models $25,000 a year for an exclusive contract. you realise these guys are not making enough to employ a full time model.
No I make it quite clear with a better model of paysites. It didn't need to spend more on content, in fact it meant spending less on content.
So telling Shap he could of employed a full time shooter to shoot content for the paysite and to sell to buyers outside the online side of porn. Is bad idea. Explain why that is.
And this goes for
every single site online in mainstream niches. They could of all done the same.
Agreed. A good shooter with his iphone could produce better content than a bad shooter with the best equipment in the world. The job of a porn producer is to operate the girls and capture her performance he has instructed her to do. Thinking any guy can get a girl whose a stranger to churn out a performance similar to what she will do for her boyfriend. Is Damian's level of porn understanding.
Porn shooters operate models more than cameras. Cameras are the easy part.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stocktrader23
Robbie's ma and pa produces more income than 95% of the affiliate programs that have posted here over the last 10 years acting like they are pimps. There are / were some legitimately successful sites but most of them were complete trash and made a fraction of what everyone thought, especially profit. Who the fuck would argue with 500k / year clear on a single solo girl site with low overhead? The big programs around here would sign 50000 girls if they could reproduce that.
|
Absofuckinglutely. I know because I spoke to them about buying the product. The pimp act went out the window as they tried to get us to shoot for peanuts.
Squealer turns up here, sees what Eva and I are running and thinks we're going to fuck around shooting cheap sets of his Russian girls. Then posts it here. But no one hear thinks there anyway we are
not going to give him 1/3 or production operation for shooting his crap and losing money.
Yes you're spot on here. The big pimping act from many was just an act when it came to acquiring the product the members needed.