Quote:
Originally Posted by epitome
Did you miss my post saying both are viable models for tube sites? Porn Hub surfers are used to full length videos supported by ad revenue. Gay Tube surfers are used to mostly promo clips with links to the corresponding site. Why change either when both work and both sites are cash cows in their own respective ways. There are plenty of ways to make money in this industry as evidenced by all of the people making money different ways.
A guy making three million a year off free joins isn't going to convince a guy making three million a year off of full joins that his way is better.
|
you missed the point
the fact that both work is not an issue
it WHY both work
the entire reason why gaytube was brought up was as proof that you could
change pornhub model to that of gaytube and it would not cause a massive loss of traffic
that the revenue from the site would
INCREASE if you made the change
the problem is morons like porno jew and robbie are so fundamentally clueless about how a tube site works that they attribute the massive amount of gay views that pornhub to consequence (higher seo ranking) rather then the cause (long videos with lower bounce rates)
if it was just on page/off page/links fabian could easily duplicate that and make gaytube the number one ranked site for gay porn
bounce rate makes a huge difference in this case, and dumping all the long videos, replacing them with short clips/ or old videos that people would look and and leave quickly would tank the PRIMARY traffic source of pornhub
That why i said that robbie idea was mininova of pornhub
because both mininova and pornhub are not type in domains
they were sites branded as being type in able because of the massive amount of seo traffic they get.
Traffic they only get because of their stickiness
A stickiness which only kept fresh by user submitted content.