Quote:
Originally Posted by vsex
Thanks for your input, you've really gained ground here on your views.  |
answer my questions idiot?
why do they find no significant cancer reduction when they studied his patients? multiple times.
(since you can't figure it out for yourself, with any treatment, even if they ate shit as a treatment, some are going to improve, some will stay the same, some will get worse, thus explains the patients at congress. it doesn't mean anything statistically nor prove the efficacy of his "treatment.")
why no acceptance in peer reviewed journals?
why no independent tests can replicate his findings? if the tests were done incorrectly surely they could just do them again with a higher dosage? why is that not being done? three different groups all tried to replicate his findings and couldn't. were they all incompetent or part of the conspiracy?
(also i am unable to find any copy of these supposed letters outside of the documentary. if you can find them, please share).