Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
I would say it's a lot better than Twistys.
And so it should be, this is Michael Ancher's content. A Penthouse and Playboy level shooter. He's in the top levels of shooting this kind of porn. Comparing my work with his and not seeing the difference is sad. Saying Michael isn't good enough to shoot for Twistys is plain, well you decide. At no time did I indicate it was shot by any of us.
Explanation. I was discussing with Cherry the difference between what he shoots and what's top quality work in the erotic/glamor niche. Damina who is clueless about porn and therefore the business he works in and loves to prove it. Jumped in with his usual bullshit.
The difference in styles are obvious to anyone who shoots. It should be obvious to anyone in porn.
Damian threatened to bring it here to make me look stupid.
Seems the ball bounced beck into his mouth.
 |
Any idea when the shots were taken?
While I think it's pretty fucking awesome how you set up Damian, it's not necessarily the slam dunk boo-ya you think it is.
Ancher started shooting for magazines back in 82' so is likely in his mid-fifties or older and has lived in Prague since 2000. So even if they were shot recently, it's a small sample size, feature a late teens/early 20s Czech girl, were shot by someone with life experiences similar to yours, someone whose notion of the ideal is likely very similar to yours, and given your acknowledgement that he's a better photographer than you, I think it's reasonable to assume that you've at least somewhat emulated his work over the years.
http://www.michaelancher.com/about.html