Quote:
Originally Posted by DateDoc
There is a lady suing the movie because there wasn't enough action in the movie - lol!
"As WDIV-TV in Detroit reports, Sarah Deming's suit claims that FilmDistrict and Emagine Novi Theater violated Michigan's Consumer Protection Act by releasing such a disingenuous advertisement for their driving-deficient crap-film. Drive "bore very little similarity to a chase, or race action film ... having very little driving in the motion picture," states the lawsuit (which also alleges anti-Semitism). Deming wants her money back, and also "an end to misleading trailers" so that the American people get the goddamn blood-pumping thrills they pay for. She reportedly plans to go class action-style, so if you've ever been lied to at the cinema you can join her Crusade for Integrity at the Movie Places and share in the settlement (which will be somewhere between $0 and $1 zillion)."
http://m.gawker.com/5847970/woman-fi...iler-for-drive |
Well... stupid lawsuit, but she's right. It's nothing at all like the trailers would have you think. In fact, it starts out with 2 robbers getting into the car and he's going to drive. As you're sitting there getting ready for an incredible opening chase scene.. he basically drives around the corner and hides under a bridge.
The whole movie is retarded from start to finish.