Quote:
Originally Posted by lazycash
Contamination or no contamination, every dna expert has come forward and said it would have been impossible for Amanda to have killed the victim in a violent struggle and left no physical evidence on the scene, no dna, no fingerprints, no hair fibers, nothing. Instead they find all kinds of evidence pointing to Rudy Guede, he was found guilty and is in prison, there is your murderer.
|
"every dna expert has come forward" Really ? Do you mean every DNA expert on the planet ? or Every DNA expert that fancies Amanda ?
Come back with whatever answer you want and I'll say goodnight BUT.............
Your friend is murdered in the place you live with her.......you are either there....or you are NOT THERE. If you are NOT at the place you live you will have an alibi, or CCTV or something to validate that claim. Unless the Italian police have started to use US rendition and torture tactics it would be astonishing that a person as cool and intelligent as Amanda Knox would not only confess to being somewhere she wasn't but would also PRETEND that she heard the murder being committed by her former employer whilst she clasped her hands over her ears. Her former employer who was not within a mile of the location at the time !! Even some torture wouldn't produce such nonsense that would later be retracted never mind a few hours of interrogation. She was also found GUILTY of libeling a police officer, making false allegations of abuse against him. I assume you accept this is as true as you accept the so called acquital ?