View Single Post
Old 10-03-2011, 07:56 PM  
lazycash
Troll Patrol
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Local Socal
Posts: 15,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKVixens View Post
I believe she is guilty because she has NEVER been found not guilty )

"WRONG !! She was never found "not guilty" she was found "GUILTY" but on appeal the verdict was overturned BECAUSE the way the Italian police collected forensic evidence "COULD" (and note the word COULD not DID) have led to cross contamination of DNA.
All I would say is if somebody is murdered at the place you live and one day you say you sat in another room with your hands over your ears listening to your boss kill your friend and later change your story and say you were never there at all.....?!?!?"
Contamination or no contamination, every dna expert has come forward and said it would have been impossible for Amanda to have killed the victim in a violent struggle and left no physical evidence on the scene, no dna, no fingerprints, no hair fibers, nothing. Instead they find all kinds of evidence pointing to Rudy Guede, he was found guilty and is in prison, there is your murderer.
__________________
"WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams..

Its crazy..."

VenusBlogger
lazycash is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote