Quote:
Originally Posted by Leshansom
I think if I remember correctly from the seminar in Amsterdam, one very encouraging thing to hear was that Rabbits do try to give their reviews to the in house writers who are into that particular niche etc. This would allow for some pretty fair grading on the stuff that's not technical.
|
Yep, we do. You are most certainly correct. It helps, for sure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Because I've been inside Mofos and it's not quality porn. It's characterless porn scenes churned out for a cheap price. However if Cherry's videos were reviewed on ability to get a dick hard. We would need a new level. Decimal points would be handy as well.  |
That's just it, Paul. You can certainly review a site based on your idea of what makes good porn based on the production values and wankability, but you will never be able to speak for everyone. Look at amateur porn, one of the best-selling niches. People are after poorly lit and shot scenes with no stories! We try and take the position that we can't judge what people think makes a good scene and what doesn't, who they'll think is hot or not. We try and judge what we can quantify and let the user judge the rest from the tour.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherry7
Quality models has nothing to do with the technical quality of the video. I was showing you all the more important factors concerning quality that you want to ignore out of laziness or ignorance.
Of course companies want the quick sales point "HD" High RES, 8000 + blah blah blah
Do you represent the punter and you are going to tell him that really this means little, and the hotter better video does not have to be encoded at 8000 bits ?
|
Here's a quote from one of your users left on our site back in January:
Comments by: NudeFan - Score: 30/100 - Date: 1/4/2011
For sure, movies are unique and not the main stream of what is custom in that branch. When I tried to subscribe, I saw an offer for $30 the first month, after I clicked 'sign' it changed to $30 for two weeks. I even found a page where is written, that you have to pay $20 for the first 14 days, then $10 for each 3 months (Both other offers asked for $10 each 2 months) Not only the unclear pricing disappointed me, also the 1080 sign shown for some movies. After I subscribed, I tried to download the movies in highest resolution, but I only got 576*1024. I contacted this page and got as reply, that 1080-movies take a very long time to download and many computers are not able to play them. And other pages are also advertising with Full HD-Movies and don't have then. If this page would have a clear pricing plan and would not suggest to have 1080 videos, I could give her 90 points, but with that fraud 30 are a plenty!
Sure, he has a number of issues, but it's interesting that he says your video quality isn't up to snuff. It's funny how this is a complaint when you pride yourself on your production levels. You do all the hard work then do yourself a disservice in the end by not delivering the quality your product should be capable of. That's sad, mate. Just sad.