All review sites review on size mostly. The actual porn and wankability of the scene is something fre even mark.
How many videos, how long, how wide. Is about it.
How many pictures, how many scenes and how big.
Is it in focus and lit sometimes features.
Then is it exclusive. Then can it be navigated easily. And does the tour reflect the interior.
For getting a dick up, hand reaching for the lube and keep the guy on the site month after month. They come up with the stock phrase, something like. somebody will like it!!!!!!
In the real world it's like going into a restaurant and reviewing the place on, the size of the tables, size of the menu and the cutlery. Nothing but the food.
Because somebody will like it.
Quote:
|
And here's a brief list of the "moronic" companies offering fantastic quality videos:
|
What do you thing is "Quality" when it comes to porn?
Because I've been inside Mofos and it's not quality porn. It's characterless porn scenes churned out for a cheap price.
However if Cherry's videos were reviewed on ability to get a dick hard. We would need a new level. Decimal points would be handy as well.
