Quote:
Originally Posted by Connor
This is the problem with message boards... it's sometimes hard to communicate meaning, and then some of us who should be on the same team end up in back and forth sessions.
Which of course is just fine with the people who leech off this industry. The more it just looks like two sides screaming at each other, the more "muddied" the whole thing starts to seem to casual observers who then will tune out.
Everyone in this thread has certain shared interests that I don't think are being served by ICM Registry or .XXX ... and anyone who works for ICM, IFFOR, etc, has, I believe, motivations that unfortunately run counter to our best interests. As long as this is understood, we should be fine. But if that's NOT widely understood, it's a problem for all of us.
|
- .xxx does not protect the children
- .xxx was never supported by the "sponsoring" industry
- ASACP and Joan were tied into ICM over the last several years
- ASACP collects donations to "try to protect the children" when they don't. Most of the money collected went into Joan's pocket or used to collect more money.
- Joan jumped ship with ASACP because donations were dropping fast and she had to pay herself less. So she "officially" started working with ICM via IFFOR, which I bet she is getting paid a lot of money. I bet she is lobbying right now to try to make .xxx mandatory.
Joan is a back stabbing, money hungry cunt who has always used the kids as a means to make money off of the adult industry, but everything she is involved with does nothing to protect kids, just makes her lots of money. Her and ICM teamed up, watch how much damage they try to do to this industry, then we will see how many people who met her a couple times over drinks thinks that she is so nice and sweet when they find out she is trying to ruin their business.