Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
Exactly.
I fail to understand how anyone comes to any other conclusion. Two large airplanes hit the towers and set them on fire. The impact alone took out multiple floors, and eventually the damage from the impact and the resulting fire caused the floors to fall. Does it look like a controlled demolition? Perhaps, but that's because during a controlled demo that's exactly what they do - blow up floor by floor. If it was a controlled demo we would have heard the explosions. There must have been hundreds of video cameras on the two towers at that point, and not one of them picked up any explosions from a controlled demolition.
|
First of all, it's not true that none of the recorded samples and videos registered explosive sounds.
Secondly, the rush/roar of the fall of the buildings would have masked the sounds of traditional explosions.
Finally, the "demolition" or whatever would have been covert, and the dust sample tests showed the existence of incendiary thermate which burns like hell but doesn't create a bang-pow reaction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
WTC7? Is it really that hard to explain how it fell? Because buildings that are on fire for hours unchecked that suffer through an earthquake and having billions of tons of concrete dropped at it's doorstep sometimes fall.
|
Read the NIST report, the final one. NIST states that debris from the falling tower was not a factor in the crash of WTC7.
They also describe how the fires went out when they ran out of fuel, and moved on to other sections that had carpeting, wood, paper, etc... nothing that could have affected the steel,
And regardless of "earthquake and having billions of tons of concrete dropped at it's doorstep", buildings like this have never "sometimes" fallen. They are built to withstand up to five times their load, and have never collapsed - ever- due to fire or physical damage.
.