View Single Post
Old 09-23-2011, 03:15 PM  
Shotsie
Confirmed User
 
Shotsie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 12th & Tree
Posts: 1,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by campimp View Post
I'm not convinced that any politician, be it democrat or republican, is going to to be able to enact any meaningful changes given today's political environment.

And the fact that whatever side of the isle you are on, there is a media outlet that will cater directly to you does not help either. Republicans are always going to find talking points to back their beliefs just as democrats will... and no meaningful debate will ever take place because the general population does not think for itself, we just repeat what we hear without really trying to understand what we are being sold.

having said that, i think IF a republican is able to change things, that candidate would be ron paul. as someone already noted, presidents dont really have ultimate power to make changes, they need congress to back them up, and because of this i dont think he would be able to really change much on capital hill...BUT i think he can change the way the general population thinks. I think he is the only presidential candidate that will tell us the truth, i think he is ok saying what he thinks instead of trying ot say what he thinks will get him elected, and that is what we need. if he changes the way we debate, that will in the long run change the direction of the country, and that is crucial at this point. our political system is in real danger of complete collapse and unless people can start to have healthy debates about the country America truly is destined to become the laughing stock that most of the world already believes us to be

i have never voted republican, and i never thought i would, but i would vote for ron paul, if nothing else to have him tell us what is really going on.... no one else will in my opinion
Don't let Ron Paul fool you, he's all for earmarks and government waste when it helps his state and his political standing. He supported spending 200 billion on defense contracts for a project projected to be a faliure, it was because it started an arms race we know as 'Star Wars'. At the time it was criticized for being unrealistic, even unscientific, as well threatening to destabilize MAD and re-ignite an arms race, which it did. It was probably one of the biggest money wasting programs of the Reagan administration.

Texas is ranked second among states in the value of defense contracts won -$39,480,651,081 in 2007- and Ron Paul does not vote against them. So Ron Paul claims to be against war and government waste and here he is grabbing the cashcow that is government defense spending.

Ron Pauls motto should be: United in war we stand, Divided in peace we fall.
Shotsie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote