Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutt
it has nothing to do with politically correct judges and everything to do with what porno jew posted below - the straight companies are more interested in getting their share of the pie from stolen content than stomping it out. when you see a straight porn company reaching a "settlement" in legal action with a tube site it means much more than just a cash settlement.
|
I had hopes when Pink Visual/Top Bucks went after Manwin...but from what you are saying there was something "much more than just a cash settlement" involved???
I'm not sure that is true. Though obviously none of us really know except Fabian and Pink Visual. My feeling was that PV wasn't gonna win the case but it was gonna take both sides a lot of money to continue it so they settled on advice of lawyers.
And that's pretty much what every attorney has told me over the years. That it would basically cost me all of my money to even try to go after a big tube site and in the end the courts wouldn't do me any favors because they want us to go out of business...the tubes and torrents are just doing what the govt. couldn't legally do.
That's kinda why I'm thinking that when gay companies go after them...it adds another dimension to the mix. Sort of a "reverse discrimination" effect in a weird way.
But everything I just typed is purely conjecture based on what I see happen with these lawsuits and what I was told by attorneys for the last 3 years. Maybe things are changing now and it might actually work for one of the big companies like Hustler to go after them. Because I'm thinking that Larry Flynt's attorneys are better than any that I can afford...and for some reason they have apparently been telling him not to try a lawsuit the last 3 years too I guess.