|
Cherry shot a very clever piece in his 2 girl film. One girl had a clear liquid oozing from her pussy, the other from the other side of the room was shot in a way to make it look as if she was letting the liquid drip onto her pussy and rubbing into the pussy. Clever photography.
Clever porn would of been the fingering girl actually letting the liquid drop onto her fingers, then rubbing the pussy and inserting 1, then 2, then 3 fingers into the girl. While this is going on at one end of the girl we see the other end of her, her face, showing pleasure that builds to an orgasm. The more real that orgasm is the better.
OK so problems with getting it like I described it.
Creating the atmosphere where the girl will orgasm for real, making sure she's not a girl who fakes it like an LA whore porn star (so it's distinctive from 99% of LA porn scenes) and making sure she's not a girl who keeps her orgasm inside her, she has to let it out. Camp it up a bit, but at the end let her rip. Eyes rolling to the back of her eye sockets is a good one.
That's tough, with a crew in the room, tougher doing it be stopping and starting. Being an ass hole shooter or model.
For instance, the shoot where the girl got burned and the subsequent video of her on another porn shoot. She should never be allowed on a shoot and the shooter shouldn't be shooting.
Any girl who doesn't do as directed by the shooter on a shoot, should get sent home. She was told to move away from the tail pipe, she didn't. She walks home.
The shooter who can't direct a girl to do as he requires, should be given work.
Sounds tough and it is. The reason is the final product has to be good enough to keep customers glued to their screen. You can't do that with girls who do what they want to, shooters who can't get models to work as they need them to. Without losing the respect of the girl.
Girls who are on drugs and throw tantrums because they mislaid a cell phone, shooters who can't man manage a situation better than that one.
The reason is simple. Shooters who get paid for turning out poor porn, sponsors who think quantity rules over quality. The sponsor situation is ultimately to blame. They would rather, it seems, update 2-4 scenes a day than 1 great scene. Would rather fill a site with 1,000s of crap scenes than half that of good scenes. would rather employ a guy who will shoot cheap than a better one who costs more.
And that's why retention is poor.
And why my experience will build retention in many sites. I know how to teach people to do the job right. And there's far more to it than what I wrote here.
|