Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
Why? Just because your content might be the exactly the same as the content of another site doesn't mean slow sales are due to the processor. In fact, just the opposite. The difference would have to be in the sites themselves, or their traffic, or both.
|
I think you misunderstood my point. What I mean when I say 'content selection criteria' is the process one goes through when analyzing all of the different variables in determining what one feels would be the most effective 'content-end user' match. To essentially curate their website.
When someone is just starting out, they likely have to rely heavily on intuition. Given that jscott has been doing this for quite some time, he is likely also able to use a considerable amount of knowledge gained from experience and testing when choosing content that he feels will be a good match with his traffic.
So now, be it either consciously or sub-consciously, jscott likely asks himself a set of questions when deciding on content. Is this gay enough? Is this hairy enough? Is it beefy enough? etc.
Assuming that he goes through the exact same thought process when choosing a gay, hairy, beefy sponsor that uses NATS as he does when choosing a gay, hairy, beefy sponsor that uses CCBILL, it's perfectly acceptable to question whether or not the ratio disparity has anything to do with the processor.
Make sense?