Quote:
Originally Posted by Jel
I must be missing the part in this post that explains why anyone posts raw clicks when comparing/stating ratios. Well done though on being with ccbill for a long time.
|
With ccbill, unless the sponsor has selected to count clicks using one of the newer methods then unique clicks are calculated at 80% of raw clicks. So the unique clicks is not accurate.
I still have many ccbill sponsors that are using the old original method, so actually using raw clicks is a better indicator than unique clicks which is not accurate to varying degrees depending on how many sponsors you have that are counting with the old methods vs. new methods.