Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrob
Please note that litigation is used as a last resort and not the primary purpose.
|
I remember when they were first starting up.
None of us ever thought they were going to BRING litigation. No...the only reason for their existence was for defense AGAINST the govt.
None of us were looking to sue anybody. heh-heh
I think a lot of people (me included) feel that they have lost their way and are now trying to find something or anything that will make them money.
I had said in another thread that the FSC isn't even IN the adult industry, and you corrected me and told me how it was full of folks from the porn biz.
You may be technically correct in that some big shot names in our biz from L.A. might be on some kind of council or something...but the people who really run that show on a day to day basis are not true pornographers. That was what I meant.
I wish that there was still a DEDICATED organization, like the FSC was supposed to be, that was a team of first amendment lawyers with great skills in the courtroom to help keep a repressive govt. at bay.
In my opinion...the FSC would be a better friend to the adult industry by focusing on BEATING groups like the AHF in court.
Now whether my opinion of the FSC is correct or not, it is the general consensus of most people in our industry that they are not doing the job they are supposed to be doing and instead seem to be reaching for money more and more.
Maybe it's just a PR problem for them. But as a business owner and a guy who has made and still makes a lot of money...I tend to recognize it when somebody is in business to make money. And that seems to be what the FSC is all about these days.