View Single Post
Old 08-29-2011, 08:58 PM  
inthecrack
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 533
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempest View Post
You yourself said that you spend hours post processing your photos to give the customer the best quality you can... Affiliates do the same thing except that we crop/resize an image in order to get the surfer "hot" so that he clicks the link to your site and garners everyone some cash... You deliver a final product to your customers... Affiliates deliver content as a promotional means to get you the customers. The mind set between what your customers would like and what's required to entice a surfer to click through are two different animals. Your expertise is in creating a high quality end product. Affiliate expertise in converting a free loading surfer into a paying member.

When we're cropping an image we're trying to take just the absolute best part of an image and use that to promote the site. We look at that image in terms of how enticing we can make a single image to the surfer. In order to do that, and include your watermark, we'd have to add it back in after the fact which is too much work for the amount of promotional posts/pages etc. we have to make in order to generate traffic. What you're telling your affiliates to do is just take your image, resize it and use it as is. That's simply not as effective as making something that's "optimized" to sell.
This is probably the the most coherent presentation of your side of the argument so far. I have seen portions of our pictures at 200 pixel sizes that link to unaltered inthecrack content on a page which which in turn links to inthecrack. I'm cool with that.

To be clear… if we are only talking about thumbnails then this whole thread is a giant misunderstanding. We don't have readable watermarks on the thumbnails on our site either. However, if the thumbnail links to a full size image with the watermark removed then I have a bit of a problem with that. If I recall correctly the affiliate in question had resized the images to perhaps 75% of their original size and called them "giant thumbnails" so as to justify removing the watermark. Pardon the pun but that is a bit of a stretch. I don't think there was any unaltered content to be found in the links.
__________________
High on crack.


www.inthecrack.com

Last edited by inthecrack; 08-29-2011 at 09:07 PM..
inthecrack is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote