Quote:
Originally Posted by AmeliaG
I like that In The Crack has quality photography of pussy. I think it is incredibly common for people to want to be able to get a really good look at that. Surprising to me that there are not more sites focused on this. And I like good photography and a lot of people like good photography.
Why the heck would it be a bad idea to have well-shot, well-composed, nicely formatted images of something people like as much as pussy?
|
The reason so few sites have this level is simple. Few sites can afford to produce this level. They want complete scenes for $500 a set and video or even boast to paying $2,000 for 3. Well the people who can shoot this level aren't working for these prices. Even if they did they can't produce it at those prices.
I have seen the level of their work and technically it's very very high, not sure how complete sets come together or video so hard to tell emphatically. A lot of good shooters can do 1 to 4 good shots out of 200. Getting a whole scene right is a real skill. A lot more skill than it does to give it away for free and call it advertising.
I tried to look at the webmasters area to see if they pay 50% or whether affiliates are prepared to push real quality for less in return for a better ratio. This is why there are few sites of this quality online, it's simply not possible for most to pay out for traffic and this level of content.
To pay for it maybe In The Crack
NEED the type in traffic that comes from their content being distributed around the Internet for free.
This situation isn't unique. Perfect Gonzo had a great shooter and couldn't afford to or wouldn't pay out the amount required to replace him. No one I met or spoke to online would pay the asking price when they were searching for this level of content. Same goes for Party Hardcore and other site. Alsscan has great content or did. They were able to shoot it themselves.
This will get some flames, still true. Twistys was supposed to be on the level of Playboy or Penthouse, well that was the claim. It wasn't within a mile of that level, the mistakes in the shooting were many and basic. Because I expect the site couldn't or wouldn't pay out for that level of content producer.
I get annoyed when I see people flame someone for producing a great product and talk as if they're something special, because they give content away for free, don't think they should follow rules, want to be paid a lot for it and are doing something 1,000s can.