Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSquealer
Again retard. Its irrelevant. Fact.. they attack. They kill. They attack unprovoked and murder people. Why does it matter what % were "responsible owners". We can't all have suitcase nukes just because only a few "irresponsible owners" will detonate them in a populated city. Lets just turn that one into a numbers game as well and then blame the owners when it goes bad for innocent people.
|
Now you're comparing a dog to a nuke?
Quote:
|
Oh... well ok then. 50,000,000 drunk drivers on the road every year in the USA. Only XX,XXX innocent people killed. Lets use your moronic reasoning and legalize drunk driving. After all, its just a numbers game and the rights of the innocent to not be senselessly murdered are irrelevant. God Bless the USA!!
|
So according to you, we should ban alcohal ?
You want to kill off a dog that I see as a pet every day, you see it as a menace, This would be like Ralph Nader bashing the Corvair in the 60's when the asshole didn't have a drivers licence.
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that