Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild
You might start by actually reading the NIST report, because it absolutely does NOT say the building fell at freefall speed.
|
You might have read
one of the NIST reports, whose version of events changed a few times btw - but apparently you didn't read the final report - which was prompted by NIST frontman Shyan Sunder being publically confronted by a high school physics teacher on the matter.
Final Report:
http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861610
Goto page 45
NIST announces stage 2 as gravitational acceleration. It's couched in all this sciencespeak so they don't have to make any conclusions from the fact, but there it is.
On
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/f..._qa_082108.cfm NIST defines or "simplifies" gravitional acceleration as "free fall".
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild
As for a the very few vocal minority of Engineers et all saying it wasn't explained, you have to dismiss the vast majority that don't agree with that position.
|
Problem is that the majority of these people have simply not looked at the evidence, from not believing the possibility.
Most of those who are vocal in demanding at least an investigation (which was never actually conductied) were once in denial until they were presented with the facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild
I'm not going to argue with you about it there's no sense. Believe what you want, it really makes no difference.
|
You can't really believe it makes no difference whether the building/s was/were destroyed "naturally" or if they were demolished...
:D