|
Criticizing this scene is like kicking a cripple.
If Paul Markham did not put himself forward as a guru, I would not waste my time.
Maybe it represents the level of porn production at the moment, I don't know. and if it does it would explain why people do not want to pay for it.
The clip is sub standard in every way. It would not get on to any TV station, and would not get the shooter into any film school.
The film is shot in a way that would defy the best editor. There are no properly framed shots to cut with.
The scene is illuminated but not lit, the shooter has made no attempt to create any atmosphere with the lighting, or to bring out the modeling on the performer. The shooter even walks in front of his own lights to cast a shadow on the model.
No sound recordest was used and would be consider NG by any professional. Mic noise, shrill sound, over recording, street noise. Like a text book of sound mistakes in one shot.
Nothing interesting in the clothes, model or performance and no ideas except was she using a Czech food mixer as a vibrator?
As for the directing, no drama, no change from shy girl to nymph, no hesitation, no story ideas at all, just a model going through the motions.
The shot lasted 30 minutes, not bad for $2500 .
Watch any TV program to see how a scene should be shot. Would you be happy to see something this bad on your new HDTV after paying $30 ?
Paul Markham, has never studied, has learnt nothing from experience, and refuses to learn.
It is there now for all to see.
|