GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Bad couple of days for Global Warming alarmists

Bill8 · 07-28-2011, 06:21 PM

Okay, the wiki has not changed significantly, and no, the IPCC does not do peer review.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergo...Climate_Change

For a minute there I was concerned that they might have started hosting a peer review journal, but no, they haven't.

But, I see now that you did not claim that IPCC does peer review, you claimed that it reviewed peer-reviewed material and edited out that with which it does not agree.

Sorry, I misread.

But, you are the one making the claim, so it now falls upon you to provide supporting evidence. So, can you name some article the IPCC rejected, and give arguments why it shoudl not have been?

However, as I said, the IPCC is a political body, it does not create global warming theory.

Now, what you have done is throw up a red herring, trying to distract from my line of argument by claiming something about the IPCC, which ultimately does not respond to my arguments.

It's technically both a red herring and a straw man. With some adhominem implied on the straw man.

07-28-2011, 06:21 PM
Bill8 Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 1,901	Okay, the wiki has not changed significantly, and no, the IPCC does not do peer review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intergo...Climate_Change For a minute there I was concerned that they might have started hosting a peer review journal, but no, they haven't. But, I see now that you did not claim that IPCC does peer review, you claimed that it reviewed peer-reviewed material and edited out that with which it does not agree. Sorry, I misread. But, you are the one making the claim, so it now falls upon you to provide supporting evidence. So, can you name some article the IPCC rejected, and give arguments why it shoudl not have been? However, as I said, the IPCC is a political body, it does not create global warming theory. Now, what you have done is throw up a red herring, trying to distract from my line of argument by claiming something about the IPCC, which ultimately does not respond to my arguments. It's technically both a red herring and a straw man. With some adhominem implied on the straw man. Last edited by Bill8; 07-28-2011 at 06:27 PM..