Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
Your hate for Obama blinds you.
The terms of the bailout were laid out before Obama came along, at that he didn't technically do crap until after the bankruptcy, which he had nothing to do with, rather the courts and a judge determined the outcome of it based on law.
It's not even possible to twist it that Obama took it over and fucked us over with it and equally he can't be given credit for it making money today. He can only take credit for making it appear that the tax payer got some money back, which is something any of us would do if we were handed a bum deal as well.
|
A lot of excuses, thats how Barry rolls
Quote:
Originally Posted by marketsmart
no, i am saying it was not a good idea..
these companies think that they can get so big that the govt will have to bail them out..
i believe in letting companies fail and that includes banks..
what really pisses me off about this chrysler bailout is that all the pensioners and shareholders got fucked by the chap 11 re org..
there is no reason why the govt should have to forgive one cent of the money that was given to them.. 
. |
The idea was sound, they spent way too much and they didn't do it right. Looking back on it where hindsight is 20/20 isn't going change things.
Just as usual the government got a lot of money and spent.
I just think it could have been done differently
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that