Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill8
Well, I apologize then for the needlessly snippy "not that..." comment.
The value of that failed plant experiment was that it proved that carbon sequestration is going to be very difficult to do. I may have my plants mixed up, but I think that plant was a success in burning the coal more cleanly, but a failure in controlling the carbon emissions.
However, if it had been a success, it would have been a revolutionary technology, and we could have sold trillions worth of it to other countries.
---
I'm sure the companies and workers who made those road signs would disagree with you.
But I want your side to take power again - because then you will be required to produce jobs, not just do this guerilla well-poisoning from the sidelines.
It's easy to attack what the other guy is doing, harder to actually have to do it.
I despise obama, but your republicans would have done the same things he did. And if you think they also wouldn't have thrown money, you are being intentionally blind.
|
Not my republicans, last I checked, I don't own any
The hate that's worked up on both sides is to their benefit , look I have haters that without even reading what I posted, come in this thread and attack what I said, why, because of my hate for the current administration, yet let them find where I'm praising the gop?
Last president I liked was Reagan, he was a conservative that was also a leader, he worked with Tip O'Neil to raise the Social Security tax and hell even Clinton worked with the GOP to overhaul welfare, but can the current POTUS work with the other side? That's the sign of a bad leader
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that