Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild
NATS doesn't and can't be forced to interfere with the financial dealings of another company. TMM and an affiliate program have a contract. You and that affiliate program have a contract. NATS insisits with their licensees that they not use the NATS software to "shave" or deceive their affiliates. They don't, however, specify affiliate payouts. I know it seems like a subtle detail but it's important.
TMM can't afford to be involved with your contract with the affiliate program. Can you imagine the number of problems it would cause if affiliates could complain about payment issues to TMM and get affiliate programs shut down?
Think of a simpler example. You owe me $100 I lent you. I can't go to your boss and demand that money or demand that you be fired. That's between me and you only.
What you have here is a dispute with the affiliate program and not TMM. If they're violating their actual license, I am sure TMM will act. Your accounts receivable problems with the affiliate program should be addressed with the program its self. Failing a satisfactory resolution you have full access to the legal system.
|
Account receivable? Its account payable that's having problems.
"not use the NATS software to "shave" or deceive their affiliates"
Ok, you send them joins and get dick in return. Thats not deceiving enough for you?
Same accounts payable that NATS include in their script, same accounts payable that supposed to PAY my account receivables. If you want to get technical here.
So you can operate every other part of leased script and forget about one tiny module - The payouts. Sweeeet.
Lets say you lease a car for new business and say its a pizza delivery car. Instead you start making runs to Mexico and transport few beaners and couple pounds of grass with it. How's that going to fly with the bank?