Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempest
Is this one of those instances where if she had been up for 2nd degree murder, manslaughter or something like that, that the jury probably would have convicted but because it was 1st degree they just couldn't bring themselves to do it?
|
Wrong. There wasn't any proof Anthony killed her kid. Accidental or otherwise. Do I think she had something to do with her kid's death. PROBABLY. In the US juries are not supposed to convict that someone "probably" did it. Do you know why we have people that get released form prison after 10, 15, 20 years after it was found out they didn't actually do the crime. Because 12 dumb morons who had no proof thought the guy "probably" did it and convicted him because that's what everyone wanted.