Originally Posted by ShellyCrash

I stream it all day too.

People go to jail for first degree murder based on circumstantial evidence all the time. Take Scott Peterson for example. I think there are many parallels to that case.

In both cases the body had rotted past the point of being able to determine cause of death, just means (homicide), no proof to show how the victim was killed, and neither case had a smoking gun piece of evidence that stood on it's own. It was the accumulation of the circumstantial evidence that shows there is no other reasonable conclusion.

The DA has said in court they have computer evidence taken of the anthony family home PC that they claim blows the defense's George found the body and timeline that they plan to present at rebuttal after the defense rests. George did go to work that day. Once you eliminate George as being present the defense falls apart.

Additionally the defense has informed the judge that they will be changing their defense strategy / version of events. They gave the judge 3 case examples where defense has done so.

I think they will back off the sexual abuse, after all they didn't mention it what so ever with Lee Anthony on the stand. I suspect they struck a deal with the family to take that subject off the table in exchange for them to fall on their swords, so to speak, and testify in ways that will assist in Casey's defense.

I feel there is still more to see from the DA and I think in the end they will find her guilty, but will give life not death. Just my 2 cents.