View Single Post
Old 06-14-2011, 07:40 PM  
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by kane View Post
I'm not going to argue this, but this isn't really correct. It means that they chose not to hear it. It doesn't mean that the agree with it fully nor does it mean that they have ruled on it.

There was an obscenity case a few years back where the defendant won during the initial case then lost on appeal. They asked the Supreme Court to hear the case and were turned down. Why? Because the court felt that there were still other processes that could be handled at a lower court, not because they agreed with the ruling.
link please because that seems to violate the concept of double jeapordy and due process (getting found guilty of a crime at the appeal process, not a new trial)
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

Last edited by gideongallery; 06-14-2011 at 07:50 PM..
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote