|
And another interesting fact:
The brief also argues that the Second Circuit was well-reasoned. Since the Second Circuit found that the playback of programs from the remote DVR wasn?t a ?public performance,? the plaintiffs argued that this opened the door to all video-on-demand services also falling outside the realm of copyright. Again, the Solicitor General counters that this is an unfounded concern. Since the court limited its holding to situations where a unique copy was made with each recording, and where only the individual who made the recording could watch it, the business model of VOD would not be undermined if the opinion stood.
Sounds like your torrents is awfully similar to a VOD service? What makes you confident that your torrents could not be defined as being a VOD service ?
__________________
I buy plugs
Skype: Due_Global
/Due
|