Quote:
Originally Posted by V_RocKs
I think their problem was that she shared details that possibly weren't public knowledge and thereby hinted that she actually was in contact with the hacker (s). They wanted to know the source of that knowledge, she claimed journalistic shield law applied.
|
in my opinion they were just looking for someone to blame.
The whole mess was cause by a NATS fuckup anyways. They should never have coded in a backdoor so NATS employees could download its customers confidential and private data, then to top it off they used a NATS employees password to do it with. For icing on the cake , after being informed of the breach , they didn't do ANYTHING to protect its customers or even stop the data theft until AFTER it was made public on gfy and numerous nats users were reporting data theft.