Quote:
Originally Posted by JustDaveXxx
Rob no disrespect to you, but my gripe and disagreement is with FSC and the bullshit agenda that they are "trying" to push on the adult industry is a strait insult.
They want all of this money, annual fees, monthly producer fees and all that they are going to do is point you to an adult friendly clinic (because they don't have one) and put all of the talents information into a data base and make bank.
I already can get tested and get access to a talent data base for $110 per test with out my performers paying a $50 annually and me paying $250 per month producer fees for access to talents tests online.
Now RedRob, I do understand that you get paid for giving us this informaition and I do not hold any of this against you. You seem like a goot guy, but with the numbers I, and others have posted here what makes more sense to you?
FSC's bullshit, completely laughable idea of testing in the future? Or
Talent Testing which is already in place for $110 per test, with No $50 Annual talent fees and no $250 per month producers fees?
How can FSC be this dumb!! I truly believe that they have no idea that talent testing exists. Im thinking that FSC thinks that there is no other game in town and feels they can charge what they want.
What pissed me off the most is not the price but the intentions of the prices per test and all of the monthly producers dues and annual dues attached to it.
I do know one thing and that is when I shoot anal, I use lube 
O shit you are right. My bad. I was so pissed off when I was typing this that i typoed it wrong. Which is even worse.
To FSC: Since I do see that you are trying to take advantage of a situation that you really "think" you have control of, I will be contacting every agent and every producer I know and will be informing them about this extortion plot you you guys are trying to do to the adult industry. Then we as producers of the adult industry will accept tests from "Talent Testing" ONLY!!
Not worried one bit: Name one victory FSC has ever had?? This one wont be the 1st. |
And there you have it.
Dave, the FSC does not want to listen to a full time working LA producer like you. IMHO, this is a
huge mistake on their behalf.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redrob
Free Speech Coaliton vs Ashcoft, overturning the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA)
|
You are right. FSC did well with COPPA. I will give credit where credit is due.
Job well done.
Unfortunately, everything else has been an failure. And it gives me no joy to say that, but it is what it is.
COPPA = WIN
2257 = FAIL
.XXX = FAIL
Piracy Protection Racket = FAILING
STD / HIV Testing = About To Fail
And where was the FSC when PWL started releasing all of the talent information? What good is having lawyers involved if you can't take down a single abusive website? Instead, they sat back and plotted a way to make money after AIMS demise, offering a "secure" database. And while it may not have been premeditated, it was certainly convenient.
At the very least, the FSC should have had that site taken offline if for no other reason that to protect paying FSC members. Did they even try?