Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
you made the same arguement about me not reading the JH case too
believe what you want it doesn't matter
your statemement still confirms exactly the point i was making
blackmonster/robbie were both wrong copyright law has nothing to do with this case
weather it bogus complaint within the filing (body, not header only) or it never existed (your claim) it doesn't matter
the proof that i am wrong is total BS.
|
Then I must have been right about that case.
I believe the facts.... that you're talking out of your ass about a case that you have zero clue about. You called blackmonster and robbie out for only reading the article, when YOU did the exact same thing - then proceeded to talk smack like you had a clue about it. hahahaha
I've got the the entire complaint in front of me, all 17 pages of it, exactly what they're being sued for down to the fine detail.
The proof that you're right is total bullshit, the proof that you're wrong, full of shit, and lie out of your ass, is 100% factual.
But I'll let you continue to attempt to worm your way out of this one, it's rather entertaining.