Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
and you think the copyright holders fighting for this law are doing it for the public good
if the copyright holders cared about free speech at all they would have put a counter clause within the proposed bill that put their content into the public domain if they made a bogus complaint.
that would have at least proven they took the free speech danger into account when they demanded all these new rights/protections.
only copyright holders who would abuse the new protections would complain about such a clause since it won't effect those copyright holders who do proper due dillegence on their complaints.
|
ok then
If a copyright violating site make one "mistake" - or hell, 10 million "mistakes" its perfectly ok to just 'take down' their 'mistake' (but ONLY if they are caught) and carry on profiting from all their 'other mistakes' - you are saying that they should be completely protected?
but
If a copyright holder makes ONE mistake - they lose everything??
how about we make this at least a little bit equal?
.
__________________
believe me - without free porn, just as many people will seek porn out on the Internet, and many more will pay if there is no free alternative, its not like sex is a fad - it can be milked much like any renewable resource - long term
i wasn't born with enough middle fingers
- Marilyn Manson