Originally Posted by gideongallery

and you have just shown the difference between idiots how define their understanding of the law from press releases vs those who actually look at the cases themselves.

you might want to look at the actual case itself to see exactly what part was a copyright iinfringement, what part was a trademark infringement and what part was a patent infringement.

i will give you a hint the misappropriation (copying )of the design from the only official lliciencee was the copyright infringement.

of the three arguements this one is the weakest because they reverse engineered the design from a licienced replica.