Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill8
the lower case is an affectation. I use it when I am arguing politics or policy, to indicate that all this stuff is bullshit, no matter who's doing the argument.
technically, my rhetoric IS responsive, it is however not supported by demonstrations or examples.
since my claim is that the majority of the citizenry "probably" supports the language of "oil welfare", lets see what google says.
17,300,000 results. 17+ mil results could be said to imply that it is a commonly used phrase.
http://www.google.com/search?q=oil+c...ddress&ie=&oe=
this is not a proof of course, but is an example and a demonstration. |
I call "Shenanigans!"
You have failed in evry respect to support your insane claims with specific references, choosing instead to provide links to the same sort of excrement which you are spouting on this forum.
Doesn't count.
"technically, my rhetoric IS responsive, it is however not supported by demonstrations or examples."
In simple terms, you cannot in any manner support your absurd, misleading and quite possibly dangerous claims.
Got it.
Thank you for outing yourself as the fool and tool that you are.