View Single Post
Old 05-11-2011, 06:05 AM  
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc View Post
If I renamed the limewire files to .blah then you got .blah, if I broke it apart into my own format and split it up among limewire users, I'm still distro of copyrighted material. I can make it so the files aren't usable until more software is applied as well, like pw protection, encryption, etc...

Any fool can see all they're doing is calling it different words so they can work around micro loop holes in the law.
really you might want to look any one of the cacheing rulings that has come down the pike

the key difference is the act in and of itself an infringement

if the copy isn't a working copy when you take your actions into account your not distributing shit.



Quote:

Borrowing implies returning... No pirate has ever returned anything to the "owner."
really your now trying to argue that they guy recorded knight rider is the copyright owner

that who your borrowing the copy from.


Quote:

A cool, handy technology doesn't make it legal cool, handy technology.
nope the fact that the fair use of timeshifting already authorized sharing (see borrowing a friends timeshifted copy above)


Quote:
Yes it has.

We aren't talking about hacks, which is a criminal activity normally doing criminal things.
except there is no minimum security standard that establish liability
that the point
if isohunt says in their disclaimer only download if you have a right to the content (fair use or authorized)

and you download without cede authorization, that a hack too

that as much of a hack as if i left the password blank on the guest account and put an unauthorized declaration on the welcome message



Quote:
It would have to be fair use to be denied fair use.

And p2p, limewire and the mix of many others have already proven the technology CAN infringe , so yes their has been a case with previous established technologies.
reread those case they only proved that a technology can "IN and of itself" infringe

isohunt doesn't in and of itself infringe, you need at least a third party torrent client for any infringement to occur

in fact without the third party torrent client infringement is impossible

is it possible that courts will rule that it the same thing

possibly

have they done it yet

Hell NO
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

Last edited by gideongallery; 05-11-2011 at 06:07 AM..
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote