http://torrentfreak.com/mpaa-has-not...-court-110507/
while they paraphrase quite a bit the entire recording of the testimony is avalable
the key point which i don't believe this lawyer hit hard enough
is that the grokster case used as a bases for the injunction discussed a model where the entire transactional process was under the design of a single application
ISOHunt is just one independent cog in the process.
They provide a link to a torrent file, which contains no copyright material with in
That torrent file creates a session but ONLY if you have a torrent client to process the torrent
That session creates a connection to a tracker BUT ony if that tracker is available
That tracker points out potential location of pieces but only if SEEDER/PEERS are available
100% of those pieces are available only if the SEED density is over 100%
and lastly those pieces are reordered on the local hard drive to make the completed copy.
the infringment is seperated from ISOHUNT by at least 6 degree of seperation.