Quote:
Originally Posted by ShellyCrash
If someone's primary objective is murdering innocent people, and apprehending such individual puts more lives at risk than simply taking that individual out, then yes- I don't see a problem.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShellyCrash
It's not eye for an eye, it's removing a mass murdering asshole from assisting in the organization of future grand scale acts of violence and in effect protecting life.
|
so how do you call Bush (both of them)?
would it be OK to invade the White House (when they lived there) to kill them (or wherever they are living now)
How about Jimmy Carter, Dixon, and many other USA Presidents who have been sending soldiers all over the world to kill people in order to bring "PEACE"?