Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Because you don't have an answer for the same question.
Who will produce the product if the profit isn't there?
|
the guys who figuired out how to profit from the new enviroment
profits don't disappear
Types of profit disappear.
you want an example old man
profits from commercials disappeared with the vcr, profits from selling content on cassette tapes came into existance.
The new source of profits was greater than all other profits combined.
Quote:
Showing a clip on Youtube is fine. Even though the producer might not like it the damage is little.
So should the copyright law go into the size, resolution, length and what part of the original can be shown as a clip.
|
of course not
the consideration should only be the 4 conditions of fair use when compared to the LOWEST PROFITING LEGAL SUBSTITUTE.
doing anything else would cripple innovation.
Quote:
Yes copyright law needs to be updated, because it was written in days prior to the piracy we see today. That piracy is diminishing the profit of the original producer. And effecting future productions.
That's a fact not even you can argue against.
|
of course i can, total production is up in every industry
it just a fastest growing percentage is independent production
more hours of content
more people working on producing content
more total wages for actual producers
what down is profits of the big companies that are actually bleeding the little guy
if you adopted any of the techniques these new type of guerilla producers were using you would see that
you don't so you are blind to it.
Quote:
If you buy products that can be copied and pirated you're paying for the pirates free ride. Because the cost is passed onto you. If you're pirating, you're a parasite living off others who pay for you.
Step up to the plate and share what you produce for free and maybe you'll have some credibility.
|
so the only way i would have credibility when talking about these guerilla techniques is to not use the guerilla techniques.
idiot