Quote:
Originally Posted by kane
Nope. Wrong again.
Technically speaking the military/government is the copyright holder because they created the base. The people living around the base are simply profiting from it.
If we put it into media context. The government/military created the movie, the base is the movie that they created. The people living around the base are the movie theaters, video stores, DVD stores and cable companies that are making money selling that money. They didn't create it, they are simply profiting from its existence.
|
except if that your analogy you just screwed up the arguement
if the base is the movie then remove all copyright protection /closing the base makes no difference since the movie/base already exists.
It not the physically created item that issue but the service that is being run on that
the operation of the base//liciencing of the movie.
that the point, your analogy falls apart because it false
The only one that is valid is base being the act itself, the operation being the rights the act grants
and the people who benefit (from the operation) being equal the3 copyright holders who benefit (from the rights granted).