Quote:
Originally Posted by eroticsexxx
Before you attempt to diminish my contribution to this thread, I would suggest that you do more in depth research on your own. There is no "making things up" on my part as I am a member of certain scientific organizations and associations.
I am aware of the correct nature of my findings and unlike you I don't need to post a google result from 1999 and stand by it simply because the person happens to be a Phd.
Quite clearly you are not familiar with scientific and education journals that continuously promote the updating of standards across the board. Neither are you scientific minded. If you were, you would be aware of the continuous flux in regards to the procedures followed in theoretical and procedural mathematics.
By the way, I am not saying that the answers to math questions change throughout the years. What I am stating as fact is that scientists and mathematicians do continuously update their procedures and the educational finding pushed to universities and schools to ensure that there are no anomalies that would prove challenging in the future.
No making up stuff here. Facts only.
|
Math isn't science.
2+2 will always equal 4.
Science changes - gravity to Newton was different than gravity to Einstein. But the math they both used was the same math.
The answer to one question will remain the same throughout time. That's why math is what it is.
If you are so certain about this updated procedure found in so many scientific journals then you won't be hard pressed to come up with a place where it was published. Until then you are making things up, I am right and you are wrong.