Quote:
Originally posted by Nosmo King
I dunno but I have come across a number of gay sites screaming "TWINK!" all over the place that actually contained (illegal) underage pics. Maybe the term has become bastardized by a few bad webmasters, like the term "lolita". A number of processors don't accept sites that scream the word lolita either.
|
Whether or not people missuse the term though you can't compare it to lolita. Lolita = underage girl, no ifs or buts. Twink never has and again just because it's used on a site that does feature CP does that mean it should be banned from all adult sites? How many other terms both gay and/or adult were used on all of those sites? They are going to be banned also then?
A processor should know better. Rather than 'anticipating' future VISA rules (and let's face it - we're talking about Globill here already openly flaunting VISA rules it seems) they should be protecting their intrests ie adult sites. Making what should be very acceptable terms banned or taboo can only help give VISA ammunition. CP sites should be shut down but not for using what should be acceptable adult terms especially in the gay community. If we start doing thata none of us will remain in business very long.
Again though you cannot compare twink to lolita. Lolita = underage. Twink does not.