Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendzilla
I'm here to discuss, you're the one that ran out of steam
|
Not steam - patients. There's a big difference.
I start a thread about a documentary - you admit that you didn't even bother watching it - but this didn't stop you from adding your 2 cents here anyway.
Why bother spending time debating anything, when the other side doesn't care to objectively assess the information?
Regurgitated talking points, and copy-and-paste lists from sites that already agree with your position, is not all there is to a debate.
We all do it, and it's fine, but when that is the extent of the argument, then we have two walls communicating with no one.
If you watched the documentary, and wanted to debate information that was presented, cool - but to argue here, in a post about a documentary that you didn't even bother to watch?
A food critic that reviews a restaurant that he's never eaten at, is not a food critic.