Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
They wouldn't have to change insurance at all, unless they totally dropped what they have now, just like if the Corp changed insurance companies under any situation.
What they found is they would have to cover part time people fully (they're already partly covered), making them cut back the benefits of the full time people, which is contracted in and signed by each person and the corp. Ie: major legal issues.
The difference is, a private corp like mine or who you work for, can change insurance companies anytime they like, benefits any way they like, and you can't say or do anything about it, other than refuse it and pay yourself... With the union, those people, those related corps cant change ANYTHING unless they ALL agree on it.
|
But Barry said they didn't have to change anything, they will have to change to be able to afford the changes in the very law that said they will not have to change
Quote:
Originally Posted by nation-x
The #1 lesson from all of the political discussions I have participated in: Even if you prove a conservative wrong they will still insist they are right... why? Logic and facts don't have anything to do with their positions.  |
I'm more middle of the road than people give me credit, But I will never see how the present plan can save money, given how our government works
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that