View Single Post
Old 04-11-2011, 09:12 PM  
2MuchMark
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 50,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adraco View Post
Everything is realtive

Time is relative. Time is also a human concept, where the ground unit, one second is defined as 9192631770 periods of the radiation which equals the transition between the two natural states of the Cesium 133 atom.

These transitions can be almost halted, by bringing the cesium 133 atom to or very close to the Absolute zero, which is 0K on the Kelvin scale and as −273.15°C on the Celsius scale. Then we can reach an interesting state, agreed on an academic level, where 1 second, by its definition becomes longer, because the periods of radiation will decrease and thus take longer to accumulate to 9192631770 periods. So if one could totally stop the downfall of the Cesium 133, you would, by definition, also stop time as humans know it. Natural time would still go on, the earth would still spin and day would become night somwhere on the globe. At least everyone expects life to go on as usual, but in theory, since the definition is stopped, the whole world could also potentially come to a scretching halt.

It is, to this date, still very uncertain if the downfall of the highly radioactive Cesium 133 atom actually can be completely stopped or only slowed down.


On the other hand, we have light. Natural light travels at a speed of 299792.458 km/s (186000 miles a second, from Earth to the Moon it's roughly 239000 miles). If you could somehow transport yourself at the same speed, it would look like the rest of the world stood completely still. The light emanicipated would travel with you all the time, kind of following you and it would be like if you never moved but remained in the same spot. To everyone else, you would be moving incredibly fast, but from your own view, the world would be like frozen.

Now, if you could transport yourself FASTER than light, you would be able to be in Position A and watch the touchdown there, then get into your time capsule and travel for one minutes, at twice the speed of light, get out in Position B and in one minute you would be able to see the images, such as the world happened back in Position A three minutes ago.

It is today unclear where Position B exists, if it even does exist. It could be an empty future, just waiting for our light in this very moment to come in and fill it, there are also theories of a parallell universe and so on. This is what is usually referred to as time travel, to actually travel faster than the speed of light and thus already be there, when the light reaches that exact spot and then see what happened "back there". However, this creates other problems.

It is likely, that nothing created by humans has ever been able to supercede the speed of light and remain a stable mass. Some claim this is proof against time travel, others say "give it a few more years".

Remember, everything is realtive. The only thing that matters is whose perspective we use.


Freezing anything to absolute zero stops atomic movement in whatever you are freezing but does not slow time.

If you were flying at 186,000 miles per second to "catch up" to the speed of light, light itself would not appear to freeze in time. It would still move along, at 186,000 miles per second, relative to you. Only the appearance of time as viewed from your point of view would appear to slow down. This is called Einstein's Time Dilation effect, and is described in his "Twin Paradox" theory.
2MuchMark is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote