Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 Then.... Mom calls congressman "Mr. Dickhead politician, why do you allow ... ...Couple years later, on GFY after a republican president is in office and there is republican control the house and senate... ...you see new posts: " Oh fuck, can you believe this new legislation they are trying to pass...." / the end

That is a possible scenario and could it be stopped in the courts?

Since all the "targeted persons" would have "reasonable" access to the .xxx domain, that the statute's (law's) mandate would be "a legitimate interest of public safety," for the protection of "children (heard that one before?)", a restriction of "commercial speech" and not an overreach upon or preemption of "free speech" ...

This has been the 800 pound gorilla in the room with .xxx

What we have is a very poor defensible position right now. I do think that the cost and the moderation of the domain's content (IFFOR) makes .xxx very unattractive for a lot of people but also that is its hidden strength.

Better find some better hidden weaknesses to exploit in this .xxx scheme, and fast to preempt any further incursion or the real problems may start ? the "worst nightmare" comes-a-knocking ...